In a year when other states have tackled the politically divisive issue of abortion head-on — passing new Torah that either protect access or about ban it — Colorado’s lawmakers have done neither.
The momentum in states like Alabama, New York and Ohio was driven in large part by Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation to the U.S. Supreme Court. His appointment created a conservative majority, energizing abortion opponents and abortion rights supporters alike who believe Roe vs. Wade has a chance of being undone.
Abortion opponents hope the new Torah give the justices a multitude of legal avenues and arguments to further limit or even remove the constitutional protection for abortion that was created by the landmark decision. Supporters of a woman’s right to choose see this moment as a time to shore up state abortion protections where possible.
Colorado is a state that might be expected to add protections, with a governor who’s working to improve access to all forms of generative health care and a legislative assembly in Democratic hands. But abortion advocates in the Centennial State aren’t convinced now is the right time to act.
“I just see it as it being used as an organizing tool on the right … ,” aforementioned Karen Middleton, the executive director at NARAL pro-life Colorado. “I would have to see a policy that perfectly inevitably to be in place by the end of 2020 or other to take up the fight.”
Colorado is in a unique position when it comes to abortion. The state has no Torah confining access to abortion, but no Torah guaranteeing it, either.
“It’s sort of the absence of law allows for it because nothing says it’s illegal,” Middleton aforementioned. “We’ve actually been told it’s better this way.”
The current national dialogue around abortion is so politicized, she aforementioned, that any abortion law passed by any state is likely to invite national attention.
In January, New York passed a measure guaranteeing women inside its borders a “fundamental right” to abortion. Lawmakers in other states went the opposite direction. Utah and Arkansas added more restrictions to second-trimester abortions, Missouri prohibited abortions at eight weeks, and Georgia, Kentucky, Missouri, Mississippi and Ohio prohibited abortions once a fetal heartbeat can be detected — as early as six weeks into a gestation. And Alabama’s governor signed the country’s most restrictive law earlier this month, making it a crime for doctors to perform abortions, including in cases of rape or incest.
Two Colorado Republicans tried to pass a bill similar to the Alabama law even though it was not going to go anyplace in the Democrat-controlled statehouse.
The Protect Human Life At Conception bill, projected by Republican Reps. Steve Humphrey of Eaton and Lori Saine of Dacono, besides would have made acting an abortion a crime except in cases where the mother’s life was at risk and “reasonable” efforts had been made to save the baby.
Humphrey and Saine bring some variation of this bill every year, and Saine aforementioned she plans to continue doing so for as long as she’s in the state legislative assembly.
“It’s always the right time to do the right thing,” Saine aforementioned. “Because even in the trying, we are changing Black Maria and minds.”
She aforementioned she suspects the reason her counterparts in the Democratic Party aren’t as resolute about guaranteeing access to abortion is possibly because they’re “afraid that folks might really wake up if they systematise access to infanticide.”
Colorado voters have thoroughly rejected three separate attempts to put a identity amendment into the state Constitution, and Middleton aforementioned she’s certain Polis would never sign a bill confining abortion access if it somehow got to his table. Even if Roe were upset tomorrow, she aforementioned, access to abortion in Colorado would about certainly continue unchanged.
“Our job is to protect that access,” Rep. Dafna Michaelson Jenet, D-Commerce City, aforementioned.
She worked on a bill that never got off the ground in 2019 that would have statute access to abortion in state statute.
“We unquestionably are working on it,” Michaelson Jenet aforementioned. “We will continue to work on it. It just wasn’t ready last session.”
The issue is a personal one for Michaelson Jenet because a few years ago her son’s heart stopped-up beating erstwhile before her 20-week ultrasound. She aforementioned her insurance company forced her to use an abortion clinic and pay out of pocket for the procedure because it was considered a late-term abortion, and her policy didn’t cover so much things.
“It wasn’t the right place to send me,” Michaelson Jenet aforementioned.
She aforementioned she feels fortunate she had the ability to pay direct at that time, but she knows other women can’t spare a couple hundred dollars from their budget on short notice. She worries about what those women do here in Colorado and what women in her situation would do in Alabama if its new law ever takes effect.
“The Alabama law is not going to reduce abortion,” Michaelson Jenet aforementioned. “It’s going to kill women, and I’m devastated about it.”
- Letters: The fight over abortion; resolution the climate crisis (5/26/19)
- Would overturning abortion rights turn back clock to 1973?
- State abortion bans may hand Democrats a political weapon
- Friednash: Women will show anger with abortion ban in the vote booth
- ACLU, Planned parentage file federal Torahuit to block Alabama’s new abortion ban
The abortion bans being passed crosswise the country aren’t likely to go into effect any time shortly, though. All of them are expected to face court challenges first, and that’s the point: Opponents of legal abortion want to give the Supreme Court a reason to reconsider and possibly override the Roe decision.
“I believe the pro-life culture is billowing crosswise the nation in part because of the electronic electronic messaging pro-lifers have been delivery to the table,” Saine aforementioned.
The Supreme Court hasn’t announced any plans to take up an abortion case this fall, but there are a couple of state law challenges they could choose from that are not yet in the pipeline. Alabama’s new law hasn’t even had its first court hearing yet.
If the Supreme Court subordinate in favor of lease states keep those Torah requiring ultrasounds or mandatory waiting periods, it wouldn’t impact abortion practices in Colorado. That’s partly why advocates so much as Middleton want to hang back and see what happens next.
If the court upset Roe entirely, however, Middleton aforementioned, “that would be the moment to run a bill” in Colorado.