A professor at the University of Colorado’s Colorado Springs field led a project that in secret snapped photos of more than 1,700 students, faculty members and others walking in public more than six years ago in an effort to enhance facial-recognition technology.
The photographs were posted online as a informationset that could be publicly downloaded from 2016 until this past April.
While professor Terrance Boult and CU officials defended the project and its efforts to protect student privacy, a University of Denver law professor questioned whether this is an example of technological advancement crossing ethical boundaries.
“It’s yet some other area where we’re seeing privacy intrusions that disturb us,” aforementioned Bernard Chao, who teaches the intersection of law and technology at DU and antecedently practiced law in Si valley for about 20 years.
The CU Colorado Springs project, first according last week by the Colorado Springs Independent, began in 2012 with funding from a variety of U.S. intelligence and military commerce trading operations, including the Office of military service Research, Special commerce trading operations Command and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. It was not clear how much funding the project received from government agencies.
Boult’s research originally was intended to analyze facial-recognition algorithms to determine whether they were up to snuff for use by the U.S. Navy. But it turned out the technology wasn’t as efficient as the Navy wanted.
“It was resolved if you wanted to match two passport photos where the person is facing forward in good light, but not if you wanted to recognize person 100 meters away,” Boult aforementioned.
Boult and his team did more advanced research to try to improve the facial-recognition technology.
“The study is trying to make facial recognition better, especially at long range or police work applications,” Boult aforementioned. “We wanted to collect a informationset of people acting naturally in public because that’s the way people are trying to use facial recognition.”
Facial-recognition technology is being used more and more, including for property so much as facultative Facebook to tag people in pictures, in portion government agencies to check passports or visas, and on the far side .
To conduct the study, Boult set up a long-range police work camera in an office window about 150 meters away from the West field of the Colorado Springs field, a public area where passers-by would not have a reasonable expectation of privacy.
The camera sneakily photographed people walking in the area of the West field on certain years during the spring semesters of 2012 and 2013.
The candid shots caught students as they looked down at their phones, blurred in motion or walked out of frame altogether.
More than 16,000 images were taken, producing 1,732 unique identities. To protect student privacy, Boult aforementioned, he waited five years to release the informationset publicly. That way, people were unable to look at the pictures and figure out a student’s location in case of a domestic violence concern or a clandestine military placement, he aforementioned.
Jared Verner, a CU Colorado Springs interpreter, aforementioned the university is committed to academic freedom and the ability for faculty to study and research a variety of topics piece besides taking student privacy seriously.
“The research protocol was crude by the UCCS Institutional Review Board, which assures the protection of the rights and welfare of human subjects in research,” Verner wrote in a statement. “No personal information was collected or dealt out in this specific study. The photographs were collected in public areas and made available to researchers after five years when most students would have graduated.”
DU’s Chao noted that if the study was approved by the university’s institutional review board, CU Colorado Springs determined that there was not substantial concern about individuals being battle-scarred. Still, Chao called the project “surprising.”
“There’s crawl concern that possibly he has all this information and all these photos, and what other use could be used for that?” Chao aforementioned.
The informationset of photos was taken off the net on April 15, but not because of privacy concerns, Boult noted. The CU Colorado Springs informationset was used in an April article in the financial Times entitled, “Who’s exploitation your face? The ugly truth about facial recognition.”
“They gave out more information in the article than we had intended,” Boult aforementioned.
The information published basined the date and time the photos were taken, which Boult aforementioned defeated the intended purpose of trying to randomize the photos in the informationset. Boult aforementioned he’s considering cathartic some other version of the information publicly that would fix this.
If a student objected to being inadvertently involved in the study, Boult aforementioned he would try to make amends.
“If person wants to come and sit in my lab and go through the thousands of photos and say, ‘That one is me,’ we can gladly remove them from the informationset,” Boult aforementioned.
Related Articles
- Amazon may be working on “informationbase of suspicious persons” exploitation facial recognition
- Researchers use facial recognition tools to predict sexual orientation. LGBT groups aren’t happy.
- Facial recognition, fingerprints could replace airline boarding passes
- Flickr to feature better facial recognition
But Boult argues the students’ faces are being used for the lesser good, expression he balanced the privacy of students with the need to improve facial-recognition systems.
“As long as the systems are bad, their potential misuse is consistent,” Boult aforementioned. “If police use them and they match the wrong person, that’s not good. Our job as researchers is to balance the privacy inevitably with the research value this provides society, and we went above and on the far side what was required.”
Chao countered by expression Boult’s reasoning assumes what government or federal agencies are doing is thing society wants them to do when that might not be the case.
“He may be portion them do thing that’s not right in the first place,” Chao aforementioned. “I’m not sure I want to be in a state where every place I walk, my picture is being taken and mechanically uploaded into facial-recognition software program program. I actually know I would not like that. I think the response is, ‘Maybe we just shouldn’t be doing this, period.’ “